Assumption
What must be true for this idea to work?
CREATELAB · USTP · OCTOBER 22, 2026
SCROLL TO DISCOVER ↓
EVERYTHING STARTS HERE
Someone is struggling.
Something takes too long.
Something should be better.
THE CONSTANT
Hold your solution lightly.
Let the evidence change your mind.
THE POSSIBILITIES JUST EXPANDED
AI makes it faster to turn an idea
into something people can try.
DON’T BELIEVE ME?
Teachers spend time turning learning goals into structured lesson plans.
Our hypothesis: a draft assistant could reduce preparation effort while keeping the teacher in control.
Choose a grade and subject. Supply the competency and applicable template. Review and edit a draft. Export.
A prototype to test with teachers. DepEd alignment requires the correct references and human review.
YOUR GUIDE FOR TODAY
Builder. Founder.
Chief Technology Officer, Symph.
More than a decade building technology products, advising businesses, and growing engineering teams.
The longer story ↗
PRODUCTS. PEOPLE. REAL-WORLD COMPLEXITY.
THE HONEST VERSION
I built multiple startups.
A lot of them failed.
That was my tuition fee.
It taught me to test assumptions faster
and get closer to customers.
EXPERIMENTATION IS A PRACTICE
What must be true for this idea to work?
What is the smallest honest way to test it?
What did people actually do?
Continue, change direction, or stop.
AI accelerates the building. You still own the learning.
THE REASON TO BUILD
For a teacher More time for teaching.
For a community Better access to a service.
For a student A problem becomes an opportunity.
The opportunity starts with an unmet need. A beautiful demo is an invitation to investigate it.
WHAT ARE WE ACTUALLY TESTING?
Can someone understand and use this proposed experience?
Today: a UI with sample data.Can a small real offering deliver value and test the key assumption?
Next: a limited pilot with teachers.Did it help enough for people to use it again?
Measure effort, errors, and repeat use.THE HOW · 01
Prompt engineering starts with articulation.
“Build me a lesson planner.
Make it professional.”
“Create a mobile-friendly prototype for a Grade 7 teacher. The main task is reviewing a lesson draft against a supplied template. Use fictional data. Include editing, missing-reference warnings, and export.”
THE HOW · 02
The more you can notice,
the more precisely you can ask.
Everything you need in one place!
Dashboard / Tools / Features / More
Compare: hierarchy, spacing, contrast, language, and the clarity of the next action. Both interfaces are illustrative.
THE HOW · 03
“I like this” becomes
“Here is why it works.”
Borrow a clear navigation pattern. Notice typography and spacing. Combine useful ideas with your users’ needs and your own point of view.
“Use the spacious layout of reference A, the clear form labels of B, and our navy-and-gold palette.”
Use permitted assets. Credit sources where appropriate. Build your own expression.
YOUR STARTING POINT
A direct starting point for the UI exercise.
Gemini Canvas ↗Browser-based creationCheck Canvas access on your account.
ChatGPT / Codex ↗Project work with an agentDescribe, build, inspect, and revise.
Claude / Claude Code ↗Artifacts and coding workflowsChoose the interface that suits your experience.
Manus ↗Agent-led tasksUseful to explore multi-step creation.
Cursor ↗Code editor with AIMore control for those comfortable with a project.
Use an account you already have. Plans, credits, and institutional access vary. No purchase required for this exercise: pair up or sketch the interface if access is unavailable.
YOUR TURN · 12 MINUTES
UI prototype only. No real student records.
ITERATION, IN PLAIN SIGHT
“I don’t know what to do first.”Prepared UI comparison, not a live AI request
Plans · Resources · Templates · Settings
A useful revision prompt: “Make the primary task obvious. Keep everything else unchanged. Explain how I can test the improvement.”
BEYOND “NICE APP!”
“Show me how you would
prepare tomorrow’s lesson.”
Observe hesitation. Record corrections. Compare effort with their existing process. Ask what would stop them using it again.
Agree on a success threshold before testing. Record completion, assistance needed, and time spent reviewing.
A small usability test gives early signals. It does not establish broad demand or educational effectiveness.
CAPABILITY COMES WITH RESPONSIBILITY
Fictional data for prototypes. Keep student records, credentials, and confidential research out of unapproved tools.
Check sources, facts, calculations, and code behavior. Never invent interviews, results, or citations.
Disclose meaningful AI assistance. Label simulations and limitations. Respect authorship and asset permissions.
Teachers review lesson drafts. Test for bias and accessibility. Provide an option for students without paid tools.
A QUICK JUDGMENT CALL
The lesson planner produced a polished activity.
The curriculum reference does not exist.
Choose an answer.
BACK TO OUR OPENING EXPERIMENT
Time to open the agent’s result.
Connect the actual build when it is ready.
A working prototype is the beginning of validation. Show honestly what works and what still needs work.
THE CLASSROOM APPLICATION
Observe a real problem. Build a small prototype. Test it with permission. Revise based on evidence. Explain the role AI played.
Problem Whose need did you understand?
Judgment What did you accept or reject?
Evidence What changed after feedback?
Responsibility What did you verify and protect?
YOUR NEXT EXPERIMENT STARTS HERE
Find a problem worth caring about.
Make something people can try.
Learn enough to make it better.
Guest teaching, student sessions, and practical AI workshops.
DepEd lesson preparation guidelines · Check current school and curriculum requirements.
Lovable plans · Gemini Canvas guide · MVP testing
Personal story adapted from Raven’s USTP Trailblazer keynote. Photography supplied by Raven. Concept artwork is AI-generated.